From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 10:55:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C7106566C; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED9F8FC16; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ScwqX-0007mk-Hv; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:55:13 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ScwqW-000392-Ra; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:55:13 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q58AtCee012467; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:55:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q58AtCqb012466; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:55:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:55:12 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Adrian Chadd Message-ID: <20120608105512.GA12251@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120601075848.GA99316@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bwn0: RX decryption attempted (old 0 keyidx 0x1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:55:20 -0000 On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:10:18PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > I had a quick check. It doesn't look like BWN_RX_MAC_DEC is actually > an error? MAC_DECERR is much more likely an error. > > Just comment that printf out? I'm sorry, I don't understand you. I guess you refer to this fragment: GEN8> grep -C3 decry /usr/src/sys/dev/bwn/if_bwn.c if (macstat & BWN_RX_MAC_DEC && rx_mac_dec_rpt++ < 50) device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "RX decryption attempted (old %d keyidx %#x)\n", BWN_ISOLDFMT(mac), (macstat & BWN_RX_MAC_KEYIDX) >> BWN_RX_MAC_KEYIDX_SHIFT); GEN8> but I can't see MAC_DECERR here. Anyway, are you saying there is some error occuring, or are you saying it's a false positive? Many thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423