From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 14 11: 2:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.ecoutez.net (ns1.ecoutez.net [64.36.74.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAEE37B40B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:02:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mosch@ns1.ecoutez.net) Received: (from mosch@localhost) by ns1.ecoutez.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA02246; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:02:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:02:08 -0400 From: Kevin Way To: Cyrille Lefevre Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: import NetBSD rc system Message-ID: <20010614140208.A32012@ns1.ecoutez.net> References: <20010613202415.A3689@core.usrlib.org> <4rtjnv83.fsf@gits.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <4rtjnv83.fsf@gits.dyndns.org>; from clefevre-lists@noos.fr on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:42:36PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > in fact, the require keyword isn't sufficient in it's own. there > should be pre_require and post_require keywords since nfsd needs to > start mountd before to start nfsd then rpc.statd and rpc.lockd have to > be started after nfsd. My answer to this, in the reasoning that NetBSD compatibility is important, so I'd rather not change anything unneccessarily, was to create a meta script... i don't have the code in front of me, but basically it went like this nfs: PROVIDE: nfs REQUIRE: nfsd statd lockd nfsd: PROVIDE nfsd REQUIRED portmap mountd statd: PROVIDE statd REQUIRE nfsd and so on, and so forth. If I understood your concern correctly, then this should take care of things nicely. My apologies for the typos, i'm typing on a freshly broken finger and haven't gotten quite used to it yet. Kevin Way To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message