From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Feb 7 19:22:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA02900 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 19:22:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (pm3-39.ppp.wenet.net [206.15.85.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA02865; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 19:21:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA46696; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 19:18:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 19:18:47 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Zepeda To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav cc: Bill Fenner , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, nsouch@FreeBSD.ORG, wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Regarding tcpdump and plip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 8 Feb 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > I'd really, *really* like to rip out the lpt driver, since its > functionality is completely duplicated by the nlpt and lpip drivers, > which seem pretty stable now. Keeping the lpt driver will only result > in slowing down ppbus development. I don't think ppbus + nlpt + plip > is significantly larger than lpt, so size is not an argument. But doesn't ppbus depend on the SCSI code? I can imagine something like PicoBSD might not want tha that extra bloat.. I know the GENERIC kernel already has the SCSI support compiled in... - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message