From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 3 15:41:12 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id PAA06467 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 15:41:12 -0800 Received: from louie.udel.edu (mmdf@louie.udel.edu [128.175.2.33]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA06460 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 15:41:10 -0800 Received: from snow-white-fddi.udel.edu by louie.udel.edu id aa14030; 3 Mar 95 18:34 EST Received: from louie.udel.edu by snow-white.ee.udel.edu id aa16091; 3 Mar 95 18:33 EST Received: from snow-white.ee.udel.edu by beauregard.udel.edu id aa09606; 3 Mar 95 23:31 GMT To: Soochon Radee cc: tinguely@plains.nodak.edu, wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, atn-group@mitre.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: multicast pruning In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Mar 1995 18:33:48 EST." Date: Fri, 03 Mar 1995 23:31:56 +0000 From: Ajit Thyagarajan Message-ID: <9503032331.aa09606@beauregard.udel.edu> Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message you wrote: I am surprised though that you have only patched the diffs for one particular problem. Should the ntohl() not be applied to all functions that pass the group value? Like accept_report() and accept_probe() in igmp.c? >With the upcall and prune problems solved, all that's left is to check that >the LKM version works properly and some testing, and mrouted should be >ready for the 2.1 Release. Is this 2.1 release no. local to FreeBSD or something that I should be aware of too? Ajit