From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 7 20:36:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FF716A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A071F43D4C for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22920 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 20:36:57 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Mar 2005 20:36:57 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2FFCF51; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:36:56 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1946173739.20050307145644@wanadoo.fr> <200503071447.j27ElWW10343@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <1145660633.20050307160515@wanadoo.fr> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Mar 2005 15:36:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1145660633.20050307160515@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: <44psybgplk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: What's the easiest way to do a backup and verify? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:36:58 -0000 Anthony Atkielski writes: Anthony Atkielski writes: > Jerry McAllister writes: > > > Actually, if used frequently for backups - such as every day, DAT is > > notoriously prone to failure. > > I've heard this for years, but I've never encountered it, on my own > systems or on any others. My drives are HP SureStore SCSI drives. > Currently I have BASF tapes, and they've gone through about 40 cycles. > I take backups every few days, or whenever there are large changes to > the data on the server (most of the time the only changes are log files > and things like that). > > > The only real thing you can do is to read back the tape and look > > for a couple of files with fairly high inode numbers for each file > > system dumped. If you can read them, you can assume the tape > > is readable. > > I'm surprised there isn't just some way of reading the tape and doing a > few simple sanity checks on the data (without comparing it to anything). > A drive or tape error would likely show on such checks. Listing the archive contents might be what you're looking for, then...