Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 15:16:46 +0200 From: Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: looking for committer, fixing qmail RCE Message-ID: <45c17003-42bc-a8fd-6707-815215ff67d5@erdgeist.org> In-Reply-To: <20200524130055.GC39563@home.opsec.eu> References: <31f3ecf4-0dc5-def9-e240-6661e319a533@erdgeist.org> <20200524130055.GC39563@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24.05.20 15:00, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> This PR was two months old, before recently an RCE was discovered that >> would very much like to see fixed in ports. Sure, was already at it, then I stumbled about the syntax for how to report what combination of version and PORTREVISION to report for slave ports, as they don't follow the same numbering scheme. These are the port versions / revision not affected anymore qmail-1.06_5 qmail-tls-1.06_3 qmail-mysql-1.06_2 Am I supposed to bump all PORTREVISION to the same number or do I have to add entries for each slaveport? The <affects> section doesn't seem to have a concept of different version for slave ports. Best erdgeist
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45c17003-42bc-a8fd-6707-815215ff67d5>