Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 09:10:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what to do when base openssl isn't suitable Message-ID: <201607021610.u62GAkUS096413@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <SN2PR20MB0845FCF7FFB0B94255384D5E80260@SN2PR20MB0845.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2 Jul, Gerard Seibert wrote: > I have to admit that this whole discussion has gotten me confused. I > use "openssl" from ports, always have and probably always will. I use > to use the now apparently depreciate statement in the /etc/make.conf > file: > > WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=YES That's what I've been doing to build my own package set. > From what I am reading, I would replace that line with the following > statement: > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl I believe that is correct. > to force the use of the "ports" version of "openssl". Is that correct, > or is my interpretation of this incorrect? > > Thanks >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201607021610.u62GAkUS096413>