From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 26 17:43: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340E437B491 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:43:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from y3k@gti.net) Received: from sludge.amc-inc.com (ts5m-pool0-181.gti.net [208.216.126.181]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id 556DC145A3B; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:43:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3A9A6029.3EE93CA@home.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:39:09 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: Mark Yeck From: Mark Yeck To: Duraid Subject: Re: web site: ms vs freebsd Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wholeheartedly agree on this point. I've never been able to find what I'm looking for on Microsoft's site in under 20 minutes. Even things like service packs for NT 4.0 and .doc or power point readers. Things that I would expect to find easily. Incidentally, www.microsoft.com looks fine under w3m for those that dont like lynx. -mark >Do you mean nicer as in bigger, or actually being able to >find what you >want? >I find the FreeBSD site highly functional. Microsoft's site >is certainly >flashier, but I have a hard time locating meaningful >content while >sifting through the announcements about their latest >release. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message