Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:28:01 +0100 From: Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck@netcologne.de> To: Adam McLaurin <adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: squid-2.5.4_8 Message-ID: <20040309182801.GC819@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <20040309122729.103fd6b5.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> References: <000a01c405a5$a017bef0$0d00020a@zag245> <20040309171409.GB819@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20040309122729.103fd6b5.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Adam McLaurin (adam.mclaurin@gmx.net): > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:14:09 +0100 > Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck@netcologne.de> wrote: > > > * Andrej G. Zadorozhnyj (zag@sdobri.ru): > > > > > Dear Sir! Sorry to trouble you. I wait impatiently for portrevision > > > Squid > > > 2.5 Stable5. > > > When I'll can see it in port tree? > > > > Don't blame it on the maintainer :) > > > > I submitted a maintainer-update PR (ports/63651) a week ago, > > unfortunately > > it has not yet been committed. > > <irotas> FreeBSDMarcus: any chance you could look at ports/63651 ? > <irotas> or perhaps delegate some other committer to look at it .. it > needs to get committed ;/ > <FreeBSDMarcus> I don't use squid, and I'm not qualified to test this. > <irotas> ok > <FreeBSDMarcus> One thing I notice is that the PF support probably needs > to be updated. > <FreeBSDMarcus> He should check for the recent OSVERSION bump. Hm. The pf option is off by default and when I added it I thought that the admin knows what she is doing when enabling it. I will submit a patch, now that we have a definitive OSVERSION to test against, within a few hours.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040309182801.GC819>