From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 29 13:27:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CCA16A4CE
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:27:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4662A43D48
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:27:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i1TLR4kj028099;
	Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:27:04 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:27:09 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20040229.142709.97076438.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: des@des.no
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <xzp8yiophgn.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References: <xzp8yiophgn.fsf@dwp.des.no>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 'sysctl dev', round two
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:27:07 -0000

In message: <xzp8yiophgn.fsf@dwp.des.no>
            des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
:  - unattached devices still aren't picked up, which they should if
:    they have a device_t.  For instance, I don't see a sysctl entry fo=
r
:    the following:

This is because you are basing things on attach, not a node being
parented to the tree.  I have some ideas on how to deal.

Warner