From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 19 04:08:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B76716A4CE; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C643743D58; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 04:08:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BFWh3-0000xV-7D; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:12:05 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3JB8AAT027227; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:08:10 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3JB8AjL027134; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:08:10 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:08:10 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20040419110810.GA24385@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200404181922.i3IJMkTf044706@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040419032304.GA61048@regency.nsu.ru> <20040419103101.GB26102@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040419103101.GB26102@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Clement Laforet cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games Makefile ports/games/duke3d Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist ports/games/duke3d/files README.bsd fix.sh patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae wrapper.sh X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:08:09 -0000 On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 03:31:01AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:23:04AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 12:22:46PM -0700, Clement Laforet wrote: > > While this is certainly great stuff, it should probably be noted that > > ``patch-xx'' naming scheme is considered deprecated for the sake of > > ``patch-full::path::to::file.ext'' one. If it's not stated explicitly > > in porters' handbook, then it should. > > No! "::" in patch file names isn't the official way of naming > files. We've been thru this several times during the past 2 years. > Look at ports/Tools/scripts/patchtool.py. The file separator is "_". While particular choice for a separator is arguable, the general scheme for patch-files is not, right? FWIW, that was my point, not `::' vs. whatever. As a side note, I don't really see any problem with `::' or `-'. Contrary, `_' occurs a lot more frequently in filenames, so... ./danfe