Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 19:57:18 +0200 From: "Michael Ross" <gmx@ross.cx> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List Spam Filtering Message-ID: <op.wwxlhsqgg7njmm@michael-think> In-Reply-To: <201305090026.r490QQeA095142@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201305090026.r490QQeA095142@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > Hi questions@ ( spammer not cc'd ) > > Reference: >> From: Aaron Seligman <aseligman@altitudedigitalpartners.com> >> Reply-to: aseligman@altitudedigitalpartners.com >> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC) >> Subject: Re: Display & Video Campaigns-Inventory Needed >> Message-id: <1368039547.0568389241738319@mf7.sendgrid.net> > >> Happy hump-day, >> >> We have an opportunity with an RTB partner to monetize >> >> INT Geo's; UK, CAN, AUS >> >> Video: (Pre-roll, mid-roll and post-roll) > > > If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only: > - List could silently discard such spam. > - Postmaster@ (& webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have less > work. > - Less individual need to select spam phrases to copy to personal > filters > (& less time searching WTF dialect American above meant in English > ;-). > > Newbies would be told "subscribe before posting" in all of: > /etc/motd > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > Automatic list bounce response. > Only clueless, lazy, & spammers might be lost. A net gain. > > Cheers, > Julian I'm curious how much spam you get through this list. Just counted, and I have about 2 Spams per week for the last month, that's more than usual. Regards, Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wwxlhsqgg7njmm>