From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jan 30 19:54:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDD3A72F79 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 19:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14188BAD for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 19:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id dx2so56732546lbd.3 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:54:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YeHCWP1OMMrf1bO/16GVVIj6MTecW4gH0yBXoqQEtYE=; b=aYLAcZktR4Z3gcR+LJ0MAxzmeBz0eDK0ksJyu5LYtaFvHYINSgHG3KiEbn1kvoNe+Z UAwN5AwfGzHNxEOQOMRvhOtjS9UcW8tps/kFFJlek3tka2dIrVC60zjWdkvA+9f6QRoq tUuez9QAYc2IBdPZx6B/YguuXJDF7GFvBGCIlqK/l8Mgd4zdo0nOq4Az0OcMRdocR9K8 EelTS6c7IzTfLMaHcxD3XNvb+NV79dW17OEuOygD+20lOYf9DvfvHF11NEo5VAkTyEkw zATHwsS2jeYNAyjkTlE88s47wNwBx1yswfV4H0YQqjGhMki3zV+9SGgIoT5qmOBMNj3G XnhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YeHCWP1OMMrf1bO/16GVVIj6MTecW4gH0yBXoqQEtYE=; b=kougmf9O7ZUuCUIk6Jn7hToQN7Y1Va0GNTbqm7kUT6fQAqHe3XhXgVTz0MuAx7tK5W FQz2J0gYr3EoJl+VrWCohT0P107iYixL5XyV5PiUo0sQDBj8xhbyEkMUp8AJX7ktLVSn ZoDbT3Dwo1DByKRNvIgSPpYbFioXsWOitQtBa6KFmBOP+bpCJ2pvhbCVIEmfV1n9Vgyk lYG2S28AzuST9elZH3guyP1dFkadD9s5jcDTytQ5bUi9ORm5hZxD1DIviEhxJHg0zz6p JfTKoo/1pXJ/z8lnMmgwmvcoOHgMzBHO7frXb34ZczpPlCHp/QUTYyr7zcl5nzTC85L1 +hiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORksJPmJI5NuOJ26htjqKJ9VMUS7rb5Mpldh3JfGQDU8jED3m7KbxN4ZwNJ1zZ4fOvU2gXM1SkZ+Dd+wg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.13.99 with SMTP id g3mr5443434lbc.86.1454183687001; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:54:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.139.68 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:54:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56AD0DA6.3090502@selasky.org> References: <20160130180256.GT37895@zxy.spb.ru> <20160130182521.GM88527@zxy.spb.ru> <20160130183131.GN88527@zxy.spb.ru> <56AD0DA6.3090502@selasky.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:24:46 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: Re: thread-unsafety problems as spl*() ones are NOP From: mokhi To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 19:54:49 -0000 So in your opinion I shouldn't put mutex/spin/lock/unlock under splitty/splx? Can you please explain a bit more about MPSAFE using for me too? Regards, Mokhi.