From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 22 22:30:49 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16C637B401
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ints.mail.pike.ru (ints.mail.pike.ru [195.9.45.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77BA43FB1
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from babolo@cicuta.babolo.ru)
Received: (qmail 21844 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 05:48:43 -0000
Received: from babolo.ru (HELO cicuta.babolo.ru) (194.58.226.160)
  by ints.mail.pike.ru with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 05:48:43 -0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 909 invoked by uid 136);
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 05:33:48 -0000
X-ELM-OSV: (Our standard violations) hdr-charset=KOI8-R; no-hdr-encoding=1
In-Reply-To: <20030422062152.GA18011@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:33:48 +0400 (MSD)
From: "."@babolo.ru
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <1051076028.889687.908.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade & RO ports tree (was Re: [kris@freebsd.org:
	cvscommit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk])
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 05:30:49 -0000

Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:38:29AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> > > Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > > Hm, execuse me my sarcasm, but do we really need the second portupgrade
> > > > in C???
> > > 
> > > I see two main reasons:
> > > 1) portupgrade is not in base system and never be there because of ruby.
> > > 2) Because it is in ruby :)
> > 3) Because it do not works on RO mounted /usr/ports
> It does. I have always run it in such a setup.
Thank you.
That was my looong aberration

> --Stijn