From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 28 09:07:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7FF7A16A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:07:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [221.249.121.227])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 40C9743D2D; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:07:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7E91C060;
	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:07:52 +0900 (JST)
To: snap-users@kame.net
In-reply-to: gnn's message of Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:39:09 +0900.
	<m2oejrjhoi.wl@minion.local.neville-neil.com> 
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:07:52 +0900
Sender: itojun@itojun.org
Message-Id: <20040928090752.ED7E91C060@coconut.itojun.org>
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
cc: rwatson@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 8809) Patch for fragment problem in key.c 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:07:55 -0000

>Hi Folks,
>
>	Robert Watson tried to send email about this but it never got
>	through, and then Sam Leffler got ahold of me and told me he
>	fixed something similar in the FAST_IPSEC code.  So, the
>	following patch fixes, in KAME IPSec.  This patch was
>	generated against 6.0-CURRENT and I included Sam's commit
>	message.
>
>Later,
>George

	the fix is already in kame repository.  tnx.

itojun