From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 19:04:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E011065672 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524948AF.cm-4-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.73.72.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5BC8FC13 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 21C557; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:58:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4C9A5339.80200@nagual.nl> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:04:25 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Subject: Re: The nightmarish problem of installing a printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:04:26 -0000 On 22-9-2010 20:40, David Brodbeck wrote: > OI may be the only person here who actually likes CUPS. Yes, it's > complicated from a software standpoint, but configuring it is much > less opaque. You're certainly not the only one liking CUPS. I long hesitated to use it, but once I'd decided to do so, I wouldn't go back to lpr. No way. It's very easy to set up and does a great job. CUPS is OK but most FreeBSD people don't seem to think so. I don't get it.