Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:06:07 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org Cc: culverk@yumyumyum.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting libc_r from -current to -stable Message-ID: <20020829.220607.73652258.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20020829152549.GB393@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20020829151048.GL89683@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20020829112210.L22530-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org> <20020829152549.GB393@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020829152549.GB393@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> writes:
: On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:22:38AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
: | Oh, I didn't realize the userland threads implementations on -current and
: | -stable differed that much. Good luck!
:
: 'Good luck!'
:
: I keep getting that. I wonder if that's an omen.
Yes.
However, now is a good time to do the backport, because there's a lot
of work to move away from the userland model to a user/kernel split
using kse.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020829.220607.73652258.imp>