Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:24:22 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: adridg@cs.kun.nl Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of linux emulation under AMD64 (eg Opteron)? Message-ID: <20040211172422.GA17038@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0402111132140.15421-100000@wn4.sci.kun.nl> References: <200402110901.i1B91CY23063@alogis.com> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0402111132140.15421-100000@wn4.sci.kun.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:34:52AM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Holger Kipp wrote: > > is it planned to have either 32-bit and/or 64-bit Linux Emulation > > available for AMD64 in the near future or to offer a general 32-bit > > 'Emulation' to run binaries compiled for 32-bit x86? >=20 > Near future is apparently "once Peter &| David have the time." First on > the list of priorities is getting 32-bit FreeBSD binaries to work. This is > apparently close, but no cigar (and I might add that even 64-bit with > threading is now very rough again). Getting Linux stuff to work is still > much farther off. Some 32-bit binaries do run, just not all of them. I've been using the i386 p4 binary as my primary update mechanism on my amd64 test box. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAKmVFXY6L6fI4GtQRAvmBAKDg8MXZ6hO7Evj2BPr2XIqsGqY55wCg10nn yNkuEX1/RPr0omY6yzz7U5A= =f+8Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040211172422.GA17038>