From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Apr 18 04:39:13 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA01117
          for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:13 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA01107
          for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:05 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id EAA26148; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id EAA00249; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199504181139.EAA00249@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Bernard.Steiner@germany.eu.net
cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: couple of bugs in 2.0R 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Apr 95 13:23:01 +0200."
             <199504181123.NAA03844@qwerty.Germany.EU.net> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:02 -0700
Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>     currently is could affect the problem at all (the interrupt should occur i
>    n
>     less than 100ms no matter what happens).
>
>Hmm. Very strange, indeed. Note, however, that the kernel reported the
>problems in the exact sequence given above, i.e.
>first stray irq 11 and then ed0 timeout; both at a snap of a finger's time
>from ifconfig ed0 up.
>
>It works now with the watchdog at 20; I've re-tried the original kernel with a
>watchdog set to 2, and that failed.
>
>Is there anything I should do in order to help track this down, or just set
>the watchdog to 20 which doesn't make sense but works (note: there wasn't even
>a two second latency in accessing the ethernet) ?

   What about other values? ...such as 3? Also, should I assume that your ed0
is on irq 11? 

-DG