From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 17 14:01:48 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA11743 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 14:01:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA11734 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 14:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id PAA21187; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 15:56:07 -0600 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199601172156.PAA21187@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: Another cool hack with FreeBSD... To: geoff@ginsu.com (Geoff Wells) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 15:56:07 -0600 (CST) Cc: witr@rwwa.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Geoff Wells" at Jan 17, 96 04:22:50 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Did you get a chance to look at Multilink PPP (RFC 1717)? No. > I took a look at this exact same thing (and for the same reasons :). > This is what 3com (and may be Ascend) uses in thier ISDN routers to > handle two B channels. > > Geoff. > > What I did learn: > > > > 1) BSDI has something called "mslip" which is basically what we are > > discussing. > > 2) With user-level PPP one would think that this might be more feasible > > since you can hack easily... but I doubt anyone's done this. > > > > If I were to start pursuing this, I might be tempted to start with the > > latter :-) That's one reason I suggested I might be tempted to start with the latter. :-) That, and it's easier to hack on. It's one interface at the system level. ... JG