From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov  6 19:51:50 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA22844
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 19:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA22811
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 19:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA11726
  (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for <hackers@freebsd.org>); Wed, 6 Nov 1996 20:52:40 -0700
Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id VAA10194; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 21:42:52 -0600
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-Id: <199611070342.VAA10194@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: still no response
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 21:42:51 -0600 (CST)
Cc: julian@whistle.com, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199611070146.SAA09269@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Nov 6, 96 06:46:19 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > I still haven't heard back from anyone regarding the
> > session limit addition in inetd.
> > 
> > does everyone think it's a boring idea?
> > doesn no one dislikr it?
> > should I just check it in?
> 
> The inetd already has a session limit.  It's just not per service, it's
> per inetd, and it's compiled in.

I thought that was a session spawning rate limit - not a session number
limit.  Maybe I am wrong.

... JG