Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:28:29 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>, ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: graphics/rawtherapee: r342622 crashes on HEAD Message-ID: <52F355BD.1070602@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <983485A7-B1D7-406D-A03F-CDC5A412F674@FreeBSD.org> References: <52F2952E.3090509@gwdg.de> <CD6B45AC-9AA0-410F-87E3-11CAB3A87733@FreeBSD.org> <52F29CE7.2050208@FreeBSD.org> <20140205212042.GP23872@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <52F325AA.4060507@gwdg.de> <52F3304A.2040900@gwdg.de> <983485A7-B1D7-406D-A03F-CDC5A412F674@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 06.02.2014 08:23 (UTC+1) schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 06 Feb 2014, at 07:48, Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> wrote: > ... >> I just recognized, that in my CURRENT boxes in base their are two >> versions of libc++: >> >> #ll /usr/lib/libc++.so* >> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 134 3 Aug 22:33:00 2013 /usr/lib/libc++.so >> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 768248 4 Feb 18:08:00 2014 >> /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 >> >> Shouldn't libc++.so be a link to libc++.so.1 or at least also come from >> the newest built? > > No, libc++.so is a linker script, similar to libc.so: > > $ cat /usr/lib/libc++.so > /* $FreeBSD: head/lib/libc++/libc++.ldscript 253917 2013-08-03 16:23:43Z dim $ */ > GROUP ( /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 /usr/lib/libcxxrt.so ) Oh, yes. I did not look enough at it, sorry. So no problem here in this place. Thanks, Rainer > > -Dimitry >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52F355BD.1070602>