From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar 22 12:40:29 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA14204 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 12:40:29 -0800
Received: from fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov (fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.131.171]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA14198 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 12:40:28 -0800
Received: by fslg8.fsl.noaa.gov (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C)
	id AA16300; Wed, 22 Mar 95 20:40:05 GMT
Received: by junco.fsl.noaa.gov (1.38.193.4/SMI-4.1 (1.38.193.4))
	id AA17027; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 13:39:50 -0700
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 13:39:50 -0700
From: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly)
Message-Id: <9503222039.AA17027@junco.fsl.noaa.gov>
To: wmbfmk@urc.tue.nl
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199503221753.SAA05048@nietzsche> (wmbfmk@urc.tue.nl)
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of sh
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>>>> "Marc" == wmbfmk@urc tue nl <wmbfmk@urc.tue.nl> writes:


    Marc> The above line is the correct syntax to redirect stdout and
    Marc> stderr to a file or isn't it?

No, it's the correct syntax for csh.  For sh, do

	cat foo0 > foo1 2>&1

--k