Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 07 Jun 2000 12:36:30 -0400
From:      James Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu>
To:        Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.runet.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Response to ZDNet's anti-BSD Story 
Message-ID:  <200006071636.MAA27363@rac8.wam.umd.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:40:33 EDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006071138180.4440-100000@peloton.runet.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006071138180.4440-100000@peloton.runet.edu>, Brett T
aylor writes:

> -   If this had happened, the Microsoft would have surely refused to
> +   If this had happened, then
>
> -   * First, the Kerberos code could have been released under a
> +   * Third, the Kerberos code could have been released under a

Fixed.  Thank you very much.

Jamie


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006071636.MAA27363>