From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Feb 2 06:55:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA10032 for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 06:55:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from skyserv.med.osd.mil (skyserv.med.osd.mil [199.209.8.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA10026; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 06:55:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rpotts@med.osd.mil) Received: from (ae1970.med.osd.mil [161.14.168.22]) by skyserv.med.osd.mil (8.6.8.1/SCA-6.6) with SMTP id JAA18999; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 09:54:54 -0500 From: "Ross Potts" Message-Id: <9802020954.ZM7015@unknown.zmail.host> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 09:54:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: Adrian Chadd "Re: Overclocking a Pentium 120" (Feb 2, 10:42pm) References: X-Mailer: ZM-Win (3.2.1 11Sep94) To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Overclocking a Pentium 120 Cc: FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-Hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe hardware" >From Adrian Chadd: >From memory, overclocking from 120 to 133 changes the bus speed AND the >multiplier. >And from memory again, the bus speed on a 133Mhz machine is FASTER than >on a 150Mhz machine. SO if you're doing a lot of IO, just overclock it >to 133Mhz. :) Well, it looks like the unanimous recommendation is to go no furhter than 133, if at all. Thanks for the input guys/gals. I've also been warned about cross-posting, so this is my last one. THANKS FOR NOT BURNING ME! -- UNIX Rules!!! Ross Potts Internet : Ross.Potts@med.osd.mil EDS-D/SIDDOMS Phone : (703) 824-7601 Skyline Two, Suite 1200 Beeper : 5203 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041