From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 8 02:01:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAF6526 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 02:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF708FC12 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 02:01:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EAPiewlCDaFvO/2dsb2JhbABEhjW4IXOCSIELAg0ZAl+IJKAGjlCSUIEijk2BEwOIX40mkEiDEYIE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,242,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="3608851" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2012 21:01:58 -0500 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B575B406B for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:01:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:01:58 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem To: Current FreeBSD Message-ID: <1406357777.1246668.1354932118030.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Subject: Heads Up: NFSv4.1 patch going into head MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.203] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.10_GA_2692) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 02:01:59 -0000 I don't believe the patch I just committed to head for the kernel RPC to add backchannel support or the NFS client patch coming soon should affect operation unless the new "minorversion=1" is used. However, since the patch is fairly large, I thought I'd give everyone a "head up", in case it somehow impacts NFS client or server behaviour. If it does, I'm sure you'll let me know;-) rick