Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:24:28 +0200 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: comments bout netpanzer update Message-ID: <20041017122428.GA94850@wedge.madpilot.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! I'm the maintainer of games/netpanzer. In the near future a new release will be available(0.2.0). s you may nitice the port is devide3d in 2 parts: netpanzer and netpanzerdata. the second part used to download a distfile named netpanzerdata-(version), now developers have choosen to rename it to netpanzer-data-(version). My quewstion is, is it acceptable to request to change the name of the second port in an update, this would be more consistent, or should I stick to netpanzerdata and grok around with DISTNAME or DISTFILES? I understand changing a port name is an action which does not like to committers, so I'd like to know in advance what I should do. Thanks for any help and info. -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041017122428.GA94850>