From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 8 15: 9:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from freja.webgiro.com (freja.webgiro.com [212.209.29.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00214DF3 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 15:09:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from abial@webgiro.com) Received: by freja.webgiro.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 788951925; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 00:09:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freja.webgiro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758BD49CF; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 00:09:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 00:09:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrzej Bialecki To: Matthew Dillon Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Non-standard FFS parameters In-Reply-To: <199910081609.JAA03108@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :> > :> Adjusting the bytes-per-inode (-i) specification in newfs should not > :> pose a problem. > : > :IOW now you say it's ok to use very high values of -i... ;-) > : > :Andrzej Bialecki > > No, I didn't say that. My recommended maximum is still 262144. Fsck > should be reasonably fast with that number and the filesystem should > still be able to maintain reasonable efficiency. Ok, I can live with that, I guess. Thanks a lot for your help! Andrzej Bialecki // WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) // ------------------------------------------------------------------- // ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org -------- // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message