From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 28 7:38:40 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B16337B401; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 07:38:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net [68.14.63.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECF943E4A; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 07:38:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrads@ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net) Received: from ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0SFeFSQ001389; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:40:15 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0SFeAZ4001388; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:40:10 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.3 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20030127182440.A16715@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:40:10 -0600 (CST) Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies From: Conrad Sabatier To: Juli Mallett Subject: Re: tunefs using libufs. Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 28-Jan-2003 Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Conrad Sabatier [ Data: 2003-01-27 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: tunefs using libufs. ] >> I'm getting some odd behavior with tunefs (5.0-CURRENT cvsupped and built >> Sunday, Jan 26). If a filesystem, rather than an actual device, is >> specified, it spits out a weird error message regarding my linproc mount: >> >> # tunefs -p /tmp >> tunefs: linproc: could not find special device >> >> Is anyone else seeing this? Could it just be the result of the gcc >> optimizations I'm using (an admittedly heavy set of flags)? Or might it be >> related to the recent changes the OP mentioned? > > Now that libufs will hunt for the disk, tunefs shouldn't, that's all. > Doing it both shouldn't have caused a problem, I don't think, but it > does for me, too. This is caused by more-recent changes to libufs. > I'll commit a fix shortly, once I verify the behaviour is correct. Yep, that seems to have fixed it. Thanks! -- Conrad Sabatier - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message