From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 10 16:01:04 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9FD6916A4CE; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1B3C543F3F; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:01:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 0C6642ED473; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:01:04 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To: Alex Wilkinson <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au>
Message-ID: <20031111000104.GJ33733@elvis.mu.org>
References: <20031110051010.GC33733@elvis.mu.org>
	<1068454923.21784.1.camel@herring.nlsystems.com>
	<20031110233914.GC14579@squirm.dsto.defence.gov.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031110233914.GC14579@squirm.dsto.defence.gov.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: dfr@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: taskqueue patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:01:04 -0000

* Alex Wilkinson <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> [031110 15:44] wrote:
> 	On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:02:03AM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote:
> 
> 	I wasn't involved in converting taskqueue from 4.x-style SWIs to kernel
> 	threads so I can't be sure but this does look reasonable. I've been
> 	wondering about the 'not exiting' diagnostic from init for a while
> 	myself.
> 
> Hi Doug,
> 
> What are "SWIs" ?

software interrupts.

> 
>  - aW

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684