From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 15:31:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C66CDA for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F88766B for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id pv20so23056278lab.13 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:30:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6VgUuITtkx71LIvB4kzY3x2HBMHIbqkz06/nqj7PC5Y=; b=OJDELcceS6W7kZ3/08ulu9eYE05TqVhym+IHSYuHMvBjspKVzLX6dWnKlCV3w+cs6R Vo4NlzYAB5pq/OXC1sobfikt4uLIH9jykjTGtNVPOoDac1aEMbdHnlfrLuJsAClT5hMu aJRX2zHmKCeQh1OrVro3wZ7B3lVdzkEtzgdT5WtJwYZzTl9k/cyolrSUns1d7+AY9gBY fxNOpusdWnTLtt7TntRwY3M7rH1CWyvdfvt/mu6aR9QzyOzVSPwt2/yiTQmf+H/O2T7E b1qd17U2du/h/A6ANTjpdNBShtk+4mLLJi3JH1RpcxGWkzIrQlwIuvA9i3vrXMkvSpYj Kcjw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkeeOyiqN3E8DYaff+zm60tFly9PrDZiJ4FWXqm9n324qs9F98DIl6pzFx0pLynWFJuvURT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.4.200 with SMTP id m8mr20741371lam.17.1421508252714; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:24:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.47.75 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:24:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:24:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Request for comments - svnup in base ? From: Damien Fleuriot To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:31:08 -0000 On 16 January 2015 at 16:31, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 554, Issue 5, Message: 17 > On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:46:11 +0100 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > Do not bother compiling the whole subversion suite, svnup does the job. > > Absolutely. I'm amazed svnup(1) hasn't had more exposure. Developers > need svn of course, but for occasional or periodic source upgrades (svn, > http or https protocols) it works fine if somewhat slower than svn, is > seriously lightweight for smaller systems, not least because it saves > needing double diskspace for /usr/src and, if you use svn not portsnap > for ports, /usr/ports. > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BASE ? Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. I for one, would very much like it.