From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 04:24:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FA916A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:24:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC8F43D46 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:24:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAG4QTkX023393; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:26:29 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <41998127.5090506@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:25:11 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <200411160308.10451.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20041116022926.GB57056@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20041115.204608.13771454.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20041115.204608.13771454.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au Subject: Re: Detection of HTT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:24:34 -0000 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20041116022926.GB57056@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> > "Wilkinson, Alex" writes: > : Yes you're right ! This sux ! What the hell is Intel claiming that I have a > : HTT capable CPU, but really I have only 1 core ! > > I seem to recall at the time HTT was introduced that you could put an > HTT into a non-HTT ready mobo. Maybe that's what's happend? > > Warner The HTT flag in the CPUID word only says that the CPU supports the MSRs that tell you how many logical cores are in the CPU. A value of 1 in these registers is perfectly acceptable, and doesn't mean that Intel is ripping you off or that your BIOS is wrong or whatever. This really needs to be made into a FAQ, I guess. Scott