From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 9 15:06:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A71D106566B for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from madmax.bizintegrators.com (madmax.bizintegrators.com [64.94.184.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C428FC14 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shelca (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) (authenticated bits=0) by madmax.bizintegrators.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o69F6h7o023196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:06:44 -0400 (EDT) References: Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: krad Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:06:44 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Loftmail-Check: No X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 64.94.184.88 Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Global backup solution for FBSD & Ubuntu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:06:46 -0000 krad writes: > In my experience dedup requires a fairly large amount of juice so if your > backups are large I hope you machines are big on ram The way tarsnap does it is not that intensive. I have used in an old 900Mhz machine with less than 640MB of RAM and it worked well. I think the program computes some sort of hash for blocks of data and then the server checks to see if it already has that block.