From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 20 20:28:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D206537B401 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBB2943FBD for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:28:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blueeskimo@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 6980 invoked by uid 65534); 21 Jun 2003 03:27:59 -0000 Received: from dsl-cust-203.openweb.ca (EHLO [64.39.186.203]) (64.39.186.203) by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 21 Jun 2003 05:27:59 +0200 From: Adam To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1056163837.65264.43.camel@jake> References: <1056160102.65264.39.camel@jake> <20030621015444.GB62479@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1056163837.65264.43.camel@jake> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1056166078.65264.48.camel@jake> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 20 Jun 2003 23:27:59 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Hundreds of make_index errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 03:28:02 -0000 On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 22:50, Adam wrote: > This was on my 4.8 box. I'll attempt doing the same on my 5.1 box. Ok, I deleted /usr/ports on my 5.1 box and ran my update script. Still getting errors. *** ..... stockticker_applet-0.2.2_2:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete stockticker_applet-0.2.2_2:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete libwww.1:/usr/ports/www/glibwww gtkhtml-1.1.3:/usr/ports/www/gtkhtml panel_applet.5:/usr/ports/x11/libpanel : malformed entry: libwww.1:/usr/ports/www/glibwww gtkhtml-1.1.3:/usr/ports/www/gtkhtml panel_applet.5:/usr/ports/x11/libpanel | /usr/X11R6/share/gnome/.keep_me:/usr/ports/misc/gnomehier pkg-config:/usr/ports/devel/pkgconfig| gnome-themes-2.2.2:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete -engines-2.pc:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk-engines2 pkg-config:/usr/ports/devel/pkgconfig: malformed entry: -engines-2.pc:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk-engines2 pkg-config:/usr/ports/devel/pkgconfig| make_index: stockticker_applet-0.2.2_2: no entry for /usr/X11R6 make_index: stockticker_applet-0.2.2_2: no entry for /usr/X11R6 make_index: arm-rtems-g77-3.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/arm-rtems-gcc make_index: arm-rtems-g77-3.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/arm-rtems-gcc make_index: totem-0.99.0_1: no entry for /usr/local make_index: totem-0.99.0_1: no entry for /usr/local make_index: arm-rtems-gcj-3.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/arm-rtems-gcc make_index: arm-rtems-gcj-3.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/arm-rtems-gcc make_index: gnome2-fifth-toe-2.2.1_6: no entry for /usr/ports/mail/balsa2 make_index: ja-xemacs-devel-mule-canna+wnn6-21.5.b13: no entry for /usr/ports/japanese/xemacs-devel-freewnn make_index: ja-xemacs-devel-mule-canna+wnn6-21.5.b13: no entry for /usr/ports/japanese/xemacs-devel-freewnn make_index: gnome-themes-2.2.2: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gnome-themes-extras make_index: gnome-themes-2.2.2: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gnome-themes-extras make_index: p5-HTML-Mason-1.19_1: no entry for /usr/ports/www/p5-HTML-Navigation make_index: p5-HTML-Mason-1.19_1: no entry for /usr/ports/www/p5-HTML-Navigation make_index: arm-rtems-objc-3.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/arm-rtems-gcc make_index: arm-rtems-objc-3.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/arm-rtems-gcc make_index: dvdrip-0.50.13: no entry for /usr/ports/multimedia/dvts make_index: dvdrip-0.50.13: no entry for /usr/ports/multimedia/dvts make_index: dvdrip-0.50.13: no entry for /usr/ports/multimedia/transcode make_index: anjuta-1.0.2: no entry for /usr/local make_index: anjuta-1.0.2: no entry for /usr/local make_index: balsa-1.4.4: no entry for /usr/X11R6 make_index: balsa-1.4.4: no entry for /usr/X11R6 done *** I have no idea what could be causing this. Perhaps a bug in one of the commands I use in my update script? I can't imagine a more generic ports setup than what I have here. I'm not using any refuse file, custom compile rules, shared distfiles, or anything else. It's all pretty much out-of-the-box. -- Adam