From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 3 10:05:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F386216A4CE for ; Mon, 3 May 2004 10:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA89F43D48 for ; Mon, 3 May 2004 10:05:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i43H5ExZ027647 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 May 2004 13:05:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i43H59aZ097440; Mon, 3 May 2004 13:05:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16534.31685.83954.524728@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 13:05:09 -0400 (EDT) To: Brad Knowles In-Reply-To: References: <200404301403.50634.past@noc.ntua.gr> <20040430123040.GB30157@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20040430211948.GC85783@dragon.nuxi.com> <16534.21617.310294.982202@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20040503145519.GA74546@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: partial dumps (was Re: Change default dumpdir to /usr/crash?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 17:05:15 -0000 Brad Knowles writes: > At 7:55 AM -0700 2004/05/03, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > I would support the integration of the changes. With > > dual opteron systems capacities of 16 to 24 GB of memory, > > partial dump goes from a "nice to have feature" to a > > "we need this feature." > > Hmm. What about compressed dumps? Or are we doing that already? savecore -z This would help with /var sizes, but you'd still need a dump device as large as physmem. Drew