From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 16 18:40:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06E216A41C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4F943D1F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j5GIeer3004333; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:40:40 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j5GIeeWh004332; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:40:40 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:40:40 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Eric Schuele Message-ID: <20050616184040.GI21733@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <42B0E56B.4030609@trio.plala.or.jp> <200506161458.51227.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42B1C686.4090502@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42B1C686.4090502@computer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atheros drirve X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:40:44 -0000 On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:35:50PM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: > Daniel O'Connor wrote: > >On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:05, Eitarou Kamo wrote: > > > >>Is there the Atheros wi-fi driver with WPA encryption. > >>Do I need WPA_supplicant like hack? > > > >I'd say you need to use wpa_supplicant but I don't see it as a hack.. > > Seeing as this was posted to -stable... is wpa_supplicant supported by > 5.x now? It was my understanding that it was -current material. It's -current only as it requires incompatable API changes to the interface code. -- Brooks