From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 16 08:48:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B096216A4CE for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:48:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cicero2.cybercity.dk (cicero2.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B40943D45 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@thegler.dk) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port156.ds1-bav.adsl.cybercity.dk [217.157.188.161]) by cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74E31909C6; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4170E055.3020503@thegler.dk> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:48:21 +0200 From: Lars Thegler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jun Kuriyama References: <7mr7o07q1x.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <7mr7o07q1x.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Reduce dependency for p5-WWW-Mechanize* X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:48:01 -0000 Jun Kuriyama wrote: > Hi again, :-) > > More dependency reducing here: While I understand the motivation for dependency reduction, I have a feeling that, in the case of Perl modules, this is the wrong direction to go. I agree, that for instance, Pod::Parser v1.14 is currently included in lang/perl5.8. But what should happen, when this module is updated on CPAN, and textproc/p5-PodParser is updated? IMHO, the user would want the module to be updated. But if there is no dependency, the port is not installed, and the module is not updated. I agree, that we can remove the dependency now, but then we should reinsert it when textproc/p5-PodParser is updated, and I do not see that happening ;) /Lars