From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 19 03:06:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CCF16A4BF
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 03:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (sw59-121-140.adsl.seed.net.tw
	[61.59.121.140])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7125443F93
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 03:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from leafy@leafy.idv.tw)
Received: by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 46F54163; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:06:06 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:06:06 +0800
From: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030819100606.GA22580@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <2147483647.1061141322@[172.22.33.128]>
	<20030817224741.T320@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
	<20030818030054.GA58513@dragon.nuxi.com>
	<20030818211512.GB47959@garage.freebsd.pl> <844382971.1061287624@[10.0.1.3]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <844382971.1061287624@[10.0.1.3]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Subject: Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:06:08 -0000

On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Removing CPUTYPE eventually gave me back working systems (I did restore 
> 5.1-R bits prior to make world). Unfortunatly, I don't have the resources 
> to investigate this further, but for the time being, I will not use CPUTYPE 
> until others can confirm it's safe :-)
> 
> 
> Thanks all,
> Stefan
CPUTYPE in gcc32 is like a landmine. But ever since gcc33 import, CPUTYPE=p4
has yet to fail me. I use it for both world and ports.

Regards,

Jiawei Ye

-- 
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
               --inspired by The Tao of Programming