From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 8 16:33:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC36037B400 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com [192.161.36.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97E743E5E for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:33:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com) Received: from slb-av-02.boeing.com ([129.172.13.7]) by blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (8.9.2/8.8.5-M2) with ESMTP id QAA07080; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blv-hub-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slb-av-02.boeing.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/MBS-AV-02) with ESMTP id QAA14119; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xch-nwbh-02.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwbh-02.nw.nos.boeing.com [192.54.12.28]) by blv-hub-01.boeing.com (8.11.3/8.11.3/MBS-LDAP-01) with ESMTP id g78NXnm23985; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by xch-nwbh-02.nw.nos.boeing.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:33:50 -0700 Message-ID: <00EBC850E752CC46B8509DAB4D0D2CB910692C@xch-nw-29.nw.nos.boeing.com> From: "Henderson, Thomas R" To: "'Mike Silbersack'" Cc: "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: [patch] Possible newreno fix, please test Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:33:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Ruh roh, now I'm confused. From the comment at this url: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_inpu t.c?rev=1.69&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=openbsd&f=h > > I assumed that you submitted the newreno parts, but I guess that was _not_ > the case. Were your fixes more related to SACK/FACK? > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack A couple of years ago I helped Niels Provos port our Berkeley Daedalus project SACK/FACK/NewReno code (for BSDi) to OpenBSD. I did contribute the newreno piece originally to the Berkeley code. (ftp://daedalus.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/tcpsack/bsdi-3.0) Someone ported that newreno code into freebsd (looks like 1.107.2.6 on tcp_input.c-- jlemon) but not the sack code. My question was due to the fact that the proposed patch diverged from the NewReno RFC and Berkeley code-- I was curious to find out why and what problems people found to motivate that patch. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message