Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:33:42 -0700 From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> To: "'Mike Silbersack'" <silby@silby.com> Cc: "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: [patch] Possible newreno fix, please test Message-ID: <00EBC850E752CC46B8509DAB4D0D2CB910692C@xch-nw-29.nw.nos.boeing.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Ruh roh, now I'm confused. From the comment at this url: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_inpu t.c?rev=1.69&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=openbsd&f=h > > I assumed that you submitted the newreno parts, but I guess that was _not_ > the case. Were your fixes more related to SACK/FACK? > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack A couple of years ago I helped Niels Provos port our Berkeley Daedalus project SACK/FACK/NewReno code (for BSDi) to OpenBSD. I did contribute the newreno piece originally to the Berkeley code. (ftp://daedalus.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/tcpsack/bsdi-3.0) Someone ported that newreno code into freebsd (looks like 1.107.2.6 on tcp_input.c-- jlemon) but not the sack code. My question was due to the fact that the proposed patch diverged from the NewReno RFC and Berkeley code-- I was curious to find out why and what problems people found to motivate that patch. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00EBC850E752CC46B8509DAB4D0D2CB910692C>