From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Apr 13 10:33:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from phnxpop4.phnx.uswest.net (phnxpop4.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDB0C37BB37 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: (qmail 5058 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2000 17:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-ports@FreeBSD.ORG@fixme Received: (qmail 2737 invoked by uid 0); 13 Apr 2000 17:27:42 -0000 Received: from ndslppp34.phnx.uswest.net (HELO pinyon.org) (63.224.136.34) by phnxpop4.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 13 Apr 2000 17:27:42 -0000 Received: from chomsky.Pinyon.ORG (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E856D; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:27:37 -0700 (MST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.0 09/18/1999 To: Max Khon Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACE wrappers In-Reply-To: Message from Max Khon of "Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:37:47 +0700." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:27:36 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" Message-Id: <20000413172737.07E856D@pinyon.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org %hi, there! % %Is there anyone who built ACE wrappers + TAO successfully and got it %working properly under RELENG_4? But of course... www.pinyon.org/ace %I have strange problems when using native C++ exceptions. %The same stuff under 3.4-STABLE (with g++295) works flawlessly. Native exceptions were working beautifully up till sometime around September '99 but broke thereafter and were broken still when I checked a month or so ago. The problem appears to me to be thread related, so it's almost certainly a libgcc problem, but I and several other people expended a considerable amount of time trying to find the source and failed. FWIW, native exceptions are disabled in the Linux threaded versions now too. Since this is the ports list, I might point out that it would be great to have a port, but I haven't made one because 1. LinuxThreads works better than libc_r threads with ACE and especially TAO. 2. A port should still support libc_r threads, for a lot of reasons. 3. Supporting both means two sets of includes under /usr/local and different names for the libs etc. etc. Not to mention that each build of TAO with -g needs ~2G of diskspace. I build both libc_r and LinuxThreads versions on various flavors of -current and REL_ENG4, but having everthing below $ACE_ROOT makes that easy. Russell %/fjoe % % % %To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org %with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message % To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message