From owner-freebsd-multimedia Thu Jul 29 6: 9:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from acetylene.vapornet.net (acetylene.vapornet.net [209.100.218.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF7D155BD for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 06:08:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@vapornet.com) Received: from datapit.home.vapornet.net (vapornet.xnet.com [205.243.141.107]) by acetylene.vapornet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/VaporHub 1.5) with ESMTP id IAA35350; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:06:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope from: john@vapornet.com) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (krypton.vapornet.net [192.168.0.3]) by datapit.home.vapornet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/VaporServer 1.4) with ESMTP id IAA28747; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:05:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope from: john@vapornet.com) Message-Id: <199907291305.IAA28747@datapit.home.vapornet.net> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 4.5 (0410) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:05:59 -0500 Subject: Re: Gogo vs. Bladeenc, Part II From: "John Preisler" To: "Ville-Pertti Keinonen" , mestery@visi.com Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Mime-version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I understand using 128k for these "benchmark comparisons" but beyond that, of course you experience "audible degradation." use 192k or better if you actually care what it sounds like. my $0.02 -j > > writes: > >> Well, I tried the latest Gogo vs. the latest Bladeenc from our ports >> tree, and here are more results: >> >> GOGO: >> 249.15 real 239.20 user 2.15 sys >> File size: 3446902 >> >> BLADEENC: >> 540.42 real 527.44 user 5.02 sys >> File size: 3446907 >> >> (FYI, this was encoding a song that was 3:34 seconds long a dual PPro >> machine with 128MB RAM.) I'm getting about 1.17:1 compression times with >> Gogo, which is amazing to me since I previously used bladeenc, which >> gave me 2-3:1 times. And there is no difference in the output quality. > > Is it just as bad, then? > > For some sounds, the ISO demo code and most programs derived from it > (s.a. 8hz-mp3, no longer available, bladeenc, possibly gogo as well - > I don't know) produces results that are unacceptably weird. I would > assume that my experiences are due to the bugs in the psychoacoustic > model referred to in the LAME documentation. > > In many of these cases, LAME produces better output. I've yet to find > any cases where LAME would be worse, although I can sometimes hear > audible degradation compared to CD-quality. > > Note that I almost always listen to music using headphones. You can't > necessarily hear the differences in mp3 quality at 128kbit/s using > typical stereos (or even worse, "computer speakers") over the noise of > your computer. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message