Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 21:53:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201799] [NEW PORT] sysutils/racadm: Dell remote access controller admin utility Message-ID: <bug-201799-7788-glIRucttLk@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201799-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201799-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201799 Thomas <thomas+fbsd@16h.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas+fbsd@16h.uk --- Comment #18 from Thomas <thomas+fbsd@16h.uk> --- Hi All Just wondering what the hold up/blocker is on this? Having racadm running on a freebsd jumpbox/bastion box is extremely useful,= and there are commands/features that don't work on the local ssh version, such = as (in my case the main reason for needing racadm on freebsd) ssl certificate/= key uploads for idrac. local access for racadm IMO shouldn't be a blocker on this. You can always connect 'remotely' to the idrac unit. Thanks in advance. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201799-7788-glIRucttLk>