Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 May 1997 17:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net>
To:        sthaug@nethelp.no
Cc:        roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Named -- Specifying addresses to bind to.
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.3.91.970523172438.2188K-100000@zen.cypher.net>
In-Reply-To: <21922.864424761@verdi.nethelp.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
well, most people (including myself) are not running 2.2.2 or current, so 
this is news to me.

On Fri, 23 May 1997 sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:

> > ugh, this is like pulling teeth.  the issue is not EXACTLY which version 
> > of bind is included in the release, but rather only that it is RECENT 
> > because the ancient one currently in the distribution is inadequate.
> 
> The BIND version in FreeBSD-current is based on 4.9.5-P1, which was
> released 18 December 1996. I'd hardly call that ancient. The BIND
> version in FreeBSD-2.2.2 is based on 4.9.4-P1, which was released
> 5 August 1996. Not as good, but not exactly ancient either.
> 
> Yes, I agree that bind 8.1 has features that some people really need.
> But a lot of people also need *stability*, and bind 8.1 is just new
> enough (released 6 May 1997) that it may not be wise to import it into
> the main tree yet.  A better choice for most people would probably be
> 4.9.5-P2, which is just around the corner.
> 
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.970523172438.2188K-100000>