From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 7 14:56:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD7716A4E1 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C7643D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:56:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6402EB838; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:56:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on zoraida.natserv.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.3 Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23332B833; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:56:21 -0400 (EDT) References: <20060706235712.A1171@ganymede.hub.org> <44AE5240.2080200@bitfreak.org> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Darren Pilgrim Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:56:20 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: FreeBSD ISP , User Freebsd Subject: Re: IAMP servers in FreeBSD for ISP X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:56:24 -0000 Darren Pilgrim writes: > FWIW, Courier-IMAP 4 has a proxy feature wherein a single front-end IMAP > server hands does the inital authentication, then determines the server > handling the account and invisibly hands off the connection. We tried that. The proxy did not seem to "hand off" the connection. Instead for each connection there was one process running in the proxy and another on the actual machine doing the actual serving. So if we had Machine A as proxy. Machine B doing work Machine C doing work. We saw that if 500 connections came to B and 500 to C... there would be 1000 connections on A. Is that how it's supposed to work or perhaps we didn't configure it properly?