From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon Jul 16 10:57:53 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E11B104A98D; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60148B149; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id ADE521A7E1; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:57:52 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , Dmitry Marakasov , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r470444 - head/lang/gcc-ecj45 Message-ID: <20180716105752.GA69746@FreeBSD.org> References: <201805200904.w4K94BAh007929@repo.freebsd.org> <20180716094530.k6ls4yddh2nmlivd@ogg.in.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180716094530.k6ls4yddh2nmlivd@ogg.in.absolight.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:57:53 -0000 On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:45:30AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:39:11PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > I'm not really sure "cosmetic fixes" are covered by portmgr > > blanket, especially where something is a style issue. > > > > > -EXTRACT_SUFX= > > > -EXTRACT_ONLY= > > > +EXTRACT_SUFX= # empty > > > +EXTRACT_ONLY= # empty > > > > ...I preferred the original version of that and do not see this > > as a real improvement. > > There is some kind of, mmmm, style police that, I think, believe > variables must have a value No, it's not about that variables must have a value, it's to designate that it was made empty on purpose, it's not a stray line or some editor glitch. Kind of like why people write "while (...) continue;" rather than simply "while (...);". The former clearly shows the intentions, the latter could be just a stupid bug. > Never understood it myself. Hope now it is more clear for you. :-) ./danfe