Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:39:10 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetBSD package system features Message-ID: <20001130083910.O559@puck.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <005b01c059bc$d8bc32b0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>; from matt@gsicomp.on.ca on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:28:38PM -0500 References: <00112811292900.19785@nightshade> <005b01c059bc$d8bc32b0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:28:38PM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > This target scares me. Why? It is not uncommon to find an > improperly-designed port in which the deinstall target *removes* > configuration files. On a production system, this can be disastrous. I sure hope there aren't any more ports like that these days. I believe most (if not all) have been fixed. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001130083910.O559>