From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 16 18:41:24 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA10972 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 18:41:24 -0800 Received: from goof.com (root@goof.com [198.82.204.15]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA10966 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 18:41:23 -0800 Received: (from mmead@localhost) by goof.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA01341; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 21:41:02 -0500 From: "matthew c. mead" Message-Id: <199503170241.VAA01341@goof.com> Subject: Re: Lites and shared libraries? To: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 21:41:02 -0500 (EST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503162256.OAA29567@netcom14.netcom.com> from "Amancio Hasty Jr" at Mar 16, 95 02:56:54 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 754 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Amancio Hasty Jr wrote: > On my plain FreeBSD-2.0 486dx266, I am able to boot mach with > no problems;however, on my P66 running FreeBSD-current, during > the boot process, I am getting: > ld.so: (library) Bad Address > Now both mach setups are identical... Hmm ... that's odd - I have a question for you - does Lites work with a PCI bus yet? I'd really like to be able to run it (doesn't it run FreeBSD, NetBSD, and Linux shared libs?)! -matt -- Matthew C. Mead -> Virginia Tech Center for Transportation Research - -> Multiple Platform System and Network Administration Work Related -> mmead@ctr.vt.edu | mmead@goof.com <- All Other ---- ------- WWW -> http://www.goof.com/~mmead --- -----