From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 25 21:16:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5B898C87A for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647D41B5A for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by ieqy10 with SMTP id y10so63462042ieq.0 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:16:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=08WNp4oU9s6+a5LoByZFMizvPj4+1Y2tUZ5K+4WE44Q=; b=D7RdyhPnd0wTXycoA9V/VUhEQsIYpXK3LkxeUiCH23ZeXxSkDVF9WyUEyYhM/0n0CB GffCjjVnJ9NQJQj+aJaTV5/2RBJGG2Q+hPUyVcic/qb00FY+EU8NZXYIkEB32JmcRkPU aV2Jr1ilwqcHLCb8k5u/6gtUArK8CRfeS0yVkQL22CfV8I4geHCU0r+pA58zksQK4qw4 a3zq16hDO6vhLi3o/Vc7/QTSJFv+jdD+kJrGBVPmTEnbeckk1DjXuESN6JbaN+SiNx6G luZcpYEYqNrV3yk9YrVGalZwsAytAA9QaqBevUPqHiquC/kFN9XCYSRtAHdVkB9YQfLc sAfw== X-Received: by 10.50.8.3 with SMTP id n3mr6746655iga.37.1435266979808; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pg5sm4107221igb.4.2015.06.25.14.16.18 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <558C6FA2.7070509@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:16:18 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: yum on freebsd 9: No module named sqlite References: <60AFD209-581B-41B6-80D5-0119389BC447@gmail.com> <78268FF8-212C-4259-879E-F9864F06CE1E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <78268FF8-212C-4259-879E-F9864F06CE1E@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:16:20 -0000 On 06/25/2015 02:53 PM, Oscar Hodgson wrote: > Update: yum & createrepo builds / works on 10.1 (with current portsnap). This added 85 new packages (it’s a pretty clean machine). > > Is there anyway to instruct port builds to ‘just build all dependencies with the default options and let me know if it doesn’t work out?’ > > Oscar > > On Jun 22, 2015, at 11:36 AM, Oscar Hodgson wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Is anyone running yum successfully on release 9? > > I am trying to get a yum repository running on FreeBSD 9-RELEASE-p17 in order to replace a Linux machine. /usr/ports is current. sysutils/yum (3.4.3_2) builds cleanly, ‘yum’ fails to start with the above error. Yum is essentially 100% python. > > /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 is installed. There is no ‘py-sqlite’ package in ports. This error extends to various yum components (i.e. import sqlitesack, import sqlutils, and so forth). > > I am stymied. Going through the ports code has not been enlightening. Any suggestions? > > Oscar > As much as I like yum, the thing about dependencies could really frustrate some or a lot of users when they try to install some favorite package/s of theirs, and the dependencies will clash with the existing installations. Perhaps it is a bullet every will have to bite ? :) :) This will be especially true of older, no longer supported packages, or packages from other BSD clones.