From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Oct 31 3:18: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8008937B4CF; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 03:18:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca1-166.ix.netcom.com [209.109.232.166]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA27391; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:17:59 -0500 (EST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.11.1/8.11.0) id e9VBHuk09851; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 03:17:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami) To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: steve@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: open-motif default? References: <200010241003.e9OA3Dx04425@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20001027062412.A42503@dragon.nuxi.com> From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 31 Oct 2000 03:17:53 -0800 In-Reply-To: "David O'Brien"'s message of "Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:24:12 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: "David O'Brien" * HOWEVER, can we please do it after 4.2? 4.1.1 was quite an embarrassment * due to change that had repercussions the committer didn't realize. Is * switching right before 4.2 that important that we possibly open ourselves * up to bogons in 4.2? You are probably right. I will postpone it until after 4.2. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message